Analysis of Best Intrusion Detection System Software Selection for Cloud Infrastructure Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Authors

  • Rifanni Nurdin Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan,
  • Putri Harahap Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan
  • Lela Budiarti Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Keywords:

Decision Support System, AHP, Cloud Security, IDS Selection, Cyber Security

Abstract

Selecting the right security software is a critical decision for cloud infrastructure managers. This research aims to determine the best Intrusion Detection System (IDS) software using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The evaluation process involves several key criteria, such as detection accuracy, resource consumption, ease of implementation, and cost. Several IDS alternatives, including Snort, Suricata, and Zeek, were compared through pairwise comparisons to obtain a priority ranking. The results of this study provide a quantitative basis for decision-making in choosing the most effective security solution. The implementation of AHP proves to be efficient in resolving complex multi-criteria problems in the field of cloud security

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Khater, W., & Al-Maadeed, S. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making for selecting the best intrusion detection system in cloud environments. Journal of Cloud Computing, 12(1), 45-62.

Bamba, S., & Sylla, K. (2021). Comparative study of Snort and Suricata in virtualized network environments. International Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 10(2), 215-238.

Chandra, A., & Gupta, R. (2022). Evaluation of open-source IDS using AHP for enterprise cloud security. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 19(4), 4102-4115.

Hasan, M., & Rahman, S. (2024). Analysis of multi-threading capabilities in Suricata 7.0 for high-speed cloud traffic. Computer Networks, 235, 109-124.

Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2022). Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for security tool selection in OpenStack infrastructure. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 68, 103-118.

Mishra, P., & Pilli, E. S. (2021). Cloud Intrusion Detection: Techniques and Challenges. CRC Press.

Nurhadi, R., & Santoso, B. (2023). Perbandingan performa Zeek dan Snort dalam mendeteksi serangan Brute Force pada server virtual. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi, 12(1), 88-97.

Saaty, T. L. (2021). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 14(1), 1-28.

Singh, H., & Tyagi, S. K. (2025). Performance benchmarking of IDS in private cloud using AHP-TOPSIS hybrid model. Applied Soft Computing, 150, 111-128.

Tan, Z., & Jamdagni, A. (2023). Real-time intrusion detection in cloud computing: A survey of methods and evaluation metrics. Future Generation Computer Systems, 141, 301-320.

Verma, A., & Sharma, S. (2022). Resource-efficient intrusion detection systems for cloud-based IoT networks. Internet of Things Journal, 9(12), 9410-9425.

Wang, L., & Zhao, X. (2024). Accuracy vs. overhead: The trade-off in selecting network security tools using AHP. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 220, 103-120.

Xu, R., & Chen, Y. (2021). Snort 3.0: A new architecture for high-performance network security. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 51(3), 22-30.

Zhang, H., & Liu, M. (2023). Multi-criteria evaluation of Zeek for cloud-native security monitoring. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(2), 145-162.

Zhou, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Consistency analysis in AHP for cyber security management decisions. Decision Support Systems, 155, 113-128

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Nurdin, R., Harahap, P. ., & Budiarti, L. . (2026). Analysis of Best Intrusion Detection System Software Selection for Cloud Infrastructure Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Journal of Information System and Education Development, 4(2), 35–39. Retrieved from https://journal.mwsfoundation.or.id/index.php/jised/article/view/251